Quantcast
Channel: Why can't a lawyer just blame a random witness for harming a plaintiff? - Law Stack Exchange
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 4 View Live

Answer by bdb484 for Why can't a lawyer just blame a random witness for...

The requirement of a good-faith basis for impeachment and other assertions in cross-examination is rooted in common law principles and codified in many jurisdictions' rules of evidence. Federal Rule of...

View Article



Answer by ohwilleke for Why can't a lawyer just blame a random witness for...

It seems generally uncontroversial that in examining a witness at trial, a lawyer may not ask questions implying that the witness has engaged in some wrongdoing, unless the lawyer has some basis for...

View Article

Answer by A.fm. for Why can't a lawyer just blame a random witness for...

Actually, the plaintiff’s lawyer could. He may not choose to. Also, the court may not allow him to. Although he could. And it could. See:Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 611Edit to include more detail,...

View Article

Why can't a lawyer just blame a random witness for harming a plaintiff?

It seems generally uncontroversial that in examining a witness at trial, a lawyer may not ask questions implying that the witness has engaged in some wrongdoing unless the lawyer has some basis for...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 4 View Live




Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596344.js" async> </script>